The Best Sherlock Holmes Mystery for Beginners (Classic Remarks)

Classic Remarks


Classic Remarks is a meme hosted here at Pages Unbound that poses questions each Friday about classic literature and asks participants to engage in ongoing discussions surrounding not only themes in the novels but also questions about canon formation, the “timelessness” of literature, and modes of interpretation.


Leave your link to your post on your own blog in the comments below. And feel free to comment with your thoughts even if you are not officially participating with a full post!

You can find more information and the list of weekly prompts here.

(Readers who like past prompts but missed them have also answered them on their blog later and linked back to us at Pages Unbound, so feel free to do that, too!)


Which Sherlock Holmes work should someone start with if they have never read a Holmes mystery before?

Star Divider
What Sherlock Holmes Story Should Beginners Start With?

Because Sherlock Holmes stories do not need to be read in order (Watson, as narrator, might vaguely mention some previous case having occurred, but the reader needs no knowledge of it), I believe the best place for a reader new to Holmes mysteries is a story that will capture their attention and make them eager to read more. For this, I propose The Hound of the Baskervilles.

The Hound of the Baskervilles has the benefit of being a full-length novel, rather than a short story. Personally, I tend to find longer mysteries more engaging and more suspenseful than short stories, as the length gives the author time to really develop a complex narrative, introduce multiple suspects with multiple motives, etc. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle did write some excellent short stories featuring Holmes, of course, but a reader can happily delve into them after becoming familiar with Holmes in The Hound of the Baskervilles. I believe Hound is also generally one of the most beloved and recommended Holmes stories, so popular opinion also recommends it as a good place to start.

And not all Holmes stories are created equal. In 2020, I read The Sign of the Four, the second of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s Holmes stories, and I found it 1) disappointing and 2) racist. Doyle is a product of his time, of course, but I think this as an introduction to Holmes would be extremely off-putting to many readers. If one were to read the Holmes stories in order, one might start off with A Study in Scarlet, think it fine, and then be quite surprised (negatively surprised) by The Sign of the Four. So while I am generally an advocate of reading books in order, I think it unnecessary and possibly a bad idea in the case of Holmes.

What are some of your favorite Holmes stories?


The Sign of the Four by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle


Goodreads: The Sign of the Four
Series: Sherlock Holmes #2
Source: DailyLit

Official Summary

First published in 1890, the second of Sir Arthur Conan-Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes stories, The Sign of the Four is a classic of detective fiction and a forerunner of this now-ubiquitous genre. The story has everything – a beautiful damsel in distress, mysterious disappearances, a murder, a strange and lustrous pearl, a peculiar map, four desperate villains, an exotic treasure and, above it all, smiling superiorly as he moves with sure-footed confidence through the morass of conflicting clues, the inimitable Sherlock Holmes, investigator extraordinaire.

Star Divider


Usually I’m a fan of Sherlock Holmes stories and the way in which Holmes can deduce things by the smallest of clues and read into human nature with startling accuracy, but the structure of The Sign of the Four, as well as a focus on race that has not aged well, means this one is certainly not among my favorites.

The story stars with a beautiful young lady coming to Sherlock Holmes with a story about mysterious pearls she has been receiving since her father’s equally mysterious death (or disappearance) and a new note she received asking her to meet an unnamed person.  Holmes,  of course, vows to go with her and get to the bottom of what happened to her father, who is sending her treasures, and who wishes to meet with her.  What seems a straightforward case (to Holmes, if no one else) quickly takes on new complications, which helps keep the plot vivid and moving along at a nice clip.

I equally enjoyed some of the moments when the plot seems to stall, however, when Holmes’s leads and lines of questioning don’t seem to yield anything.  It adds some tension and suspense to the story and, of course, makes Holmes seem a bit more human.  Not everything can come quickly and easily even to a man of his genius.

However, I strongly dislike that the story ultimately has two parts: the first where Holmes and Watson go about solving their case and the second where a man relates a long story explaining basically “how the case came to be,” or events that happened years before the story that subsequently led to the pearls, the disappearance of the father, etc.   If this information could have been woven into the story instead of coming across as an entirely new story tacked onto the end of the first one, it might have been more engaging.

Finally, there is the issue of race.  Many books from this period, of course, have racist undertones (or overtones), and it’s something one must encounter if one wishes to read classics.  However, The Sign of the Four still made me uncomfortable with Holmes’s tendency to draw conclusions about race based on small details (ex. x action or y hand shape or whatever means the culprit must be z race) and on major parts of the story hinging on the fact that people of a certain race are violent or savages or untrustworthy or whatever.  Besides being obviously offensive, such stereotypes lessen the complexity of the story and the entire mystery.

If you’re looking to read all or most of Sherlock Holmes’s adventures, of course you’ll want to look into The Sign of the Four.  If you’re just starting out or only going to read a couple stories, you might enjoy other ones better.

3 Stars