On a recent trip, I visited one of the newest libraries in the area. I had heard others speak highly of this library, and had the general impression that it was comparatively large and equipped with all the latest technology and other cool features that could draw people in. To my surprise, then, I found myself in a largeish building that looked more like a conference center than a library. And, even though the summer reading program was in full swing, there seemed to be only three other people in the building–not counting the lone family who had shown up to what seemed to be a very high-energy children’s program. Most concerningly, the collection seemed rather small for the space.
I had many conflicting thoughts about this visit, but my prevailing emotions were disappointment tinged with a bit of dismay. When people had excitedly talked about this new library, I had envisioned something quite different. A modern building that would, of course, take into account the changing needs of the community and the changing role of the public library–an organization that often serves more as computer lab/community center/rec center/social services than it does as the time-honored repository of information. But also a building that would have what is arguably still the cornerstone of the public library, the one thing that other organizations do not tend to replicate in their own offerings–books.
Because the building itself seems comparatively large to other libraries, I think that community members might be under the impression that there really are a lot of books in this library. I would be interested to know, however, if there are actually more books than are housed in other libraries in the area. About a quarter of the building seemed dedicated to large meeting rooms, along with a conference center-style hallway and information booth (all empty). Then there were the two empty computer labs, the empty MakerSpace, and probably four different sitting areas designed to look cozy or modern, depending on one’s preference. The aisles were large and spacious. The books were…there. In the middle. On shorter than standard-sized shelves. I truly believe that if one were to count all the books, there would not be more than one would find in a tiny one-room neighborhood branch. Most of the space was empty, to give that modern-architecture feel.
Of course, many people–especially librarians–have a lot of thoughts about the role of libraries. Many people–even librarians–have argued that books no longer matter, and that books are not what people want. A lot of people would prefer to see libraries turn into social services centers, where people are provided with food, shelter, showers, and medicine. Books do not seem to be in vogue, do not seem to be trendy enough to get libraries the funding they so desperately need. And, so, libraries have become innovative at expanding beyond offering accessibility to knowledge and information and instead offering everything. If the library thinks a thing will get people in the door, they will do it.
I am one of those old-fashioned curmudgeons, however, who still believes that books matter and that equal access to knowledge and information is something to be celebrated. Meeting rooms for the public are nice, as are physical education classes, concerts, art classes, notaries, and passports. However, a lot of these services are offered by other organizations in the community. And, honestly, if I am thinking about taking a yoga class or attending a concert or getting something notarized, I usually think of other places first–the local parks and rec programs, concert halls, or just a plain old notary. I don’t check the library website first when I want live music or a painting class.
I check the library website for books, DVDs, CDs, and databases because these are specific things that I associate predominantly with the public library, and I know the library carries them and they carry them all the time. I view the programs calendar to see what is being offered, yes, but the selection tends to be random, and I just go to anything that happens to be of interest. I don’t check the library events calendar when I want something very specific like a concert because the odds of there being a concert that week or that month are low. And the odds are low because the library isn’t a concert hall, after all. If I want a wide variety of performance options–different dates, times, and genres–I need to look at an organization whose primary mission is promoting the arts. (And, yes, many organizations have these concerts free–so the library is not necessarily offering me anything I can’t find elsewhere.) That’s not to say the library is not doing something worthwhile, only that when libraries expand services, they sometimes end up replicating existing ones. And they arguably undergo a bit of an identity crisis.
Even as we celebrate all the wonderful services libraries provide, I believe that most people still associate the public library with books, magazines, DVDs, music, and databases–that is, with the library collection. A large number of people also associate the library with free computer and internet access. And a diminishing number of people probably still call the library with reference questions since librarians still market themselves as information professionals. Anything beyond that, however, is rather a bonus! The whole idea of a library, the very definition of a library, is a collection of materials. The books and other materials are the heart of the library! The collection is the thing that makes the public library different from every other local organization!
And the collection is not something that is useless or obsolete. Need to study for the SAT? Check out a book for the local school’s summer reading homework? Find information on the law? Research how to start a small business? Find credible sources for a paper? Learn how to start a new hobby? Read up on how to do a home improvement project? Try a new recipe or diet? Research a medical condition or prescription? Access free information on nearly any topic imaginable? Maybe unwind, destress, and relax with an entertaining book or movie? You can do that at the local library and you can do it with the collection. The collection still matters!
Yet, I visited this new, trendy library and I saw a building where the books seemed like an afterthought. Plenty of space was given to areas where people could meet up or hang out, and the general vibe was that the building really wanted to be a community center that kind of happened to have some books, too, if you’re into that sort of thing. And it’s worrisome! When even libraries do not believe that library collections matter, when even librarians seem to think that books just aren’t cool anymore, I believe the library as a library is in trouble. Yes, we might get an amazing new recreation center, but that is not the same thing.
So, is this where libraries are headed? Will more space be opened up for meeting rooms and computer labs, and less space given to books? Will collections shrink? I really hope not! I still love going to the library to check out books–and I don’t think I’m alone! Ideally, I would live in a world where recreation center and libraries both exist, and libraries do not disappear in favor of becoming something else.
What do you think? Should libraries shrink their book collections?



I sure hope not! I think libraries should only get bigger and have more to 9ffer as time goes on. I understand cycling out books that haven’t been checked out in ages, but not just for the sake of having less books.
LikeLike
I went to a library recently where there were about five to eight books on some of the shelves. You could stand at the end and just look through all the shelves to the other side of the building. They said they’d been weeding. I understand the concept of weeding. I just…don’t understand why you’d remove like 3/4 of the collection to do it? It was very weird to me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
After COVID many spaces are created for conferences and as a workplace outside office for those working remotely here. But there is only one library in my city that is public library which is sad to see. and for ages that one library has very poor collection. Think government doesn’t want to invest much on literature.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, now I want to imagine myself cozily working from a library on my laptop. But they’d have to add a cafe, too, haha! Or maybe that would be bad because then I’d spend money. Hmm.
Yes, it’s sad to see how under-funded so many libraries are. For so many people, they are a lifeline that provides every service imaginable when people don’t know where else to go. The other day I saw someone bring in a tool set they wanted to be fixed? I would go to a shop that sells tools for that, but, uh, I guess some people just really assume the library does literally everything these days?
LikeLiked by 2 people
The cynical side of me thinks that librarians are just trying to attract funding – and keep their jobs – by pointing to all the people coming into the space. Instead of thinking, hey, if we replicate a service that the community already has, are we doing more harm than good?
This increased emphasis on providing social services reminds me of a frank comment that I once read from a librarian. Basically, they said that libraries exist to serve everyone, but a big focus on providing social services can actually end up hurting them in the long run.
Things like food, showers, free meeting rooms, free art classes, are likely to be appreciated by someone in need. They’ll visit the library for such things. However, a wealthier person is not likely to seek the library for these services because they can afford to get them from somewhere else.
The commenter was glad that those in need could access important services at their library but also noted that the affluent patrons are likely to pay more taxes and to have more political power. If they walk and don’t come back, there goes an important base of support for the library. And unfortunately, it can be difficult to try and raise money for social services at all, let alone social services designed for those in need.
LikeLike
That makes sense to me. I see a lot of government officials who don’t value libraries and think “no one uses them anymore” presumably because they, as wealthy people, don’t need to go in them. I also have meant a sadly large number of people who tell me they won’t go in the library at all because they don’t like the type of people who hang out there (that is, they don’t want to see homeless individuals). They, too, are presumably wealthy enough that they can make this choice. But when people don’t ever go in the library, they don’t understand just how much libraries have evolved and how much they offer. So many don’t even realize that inter-library loan exists, or that you can check out music and games and movies these days–and that’s before you get to everything else!
I’m not really for libraries turning into social services, though, because I think that’s just giving governments an excuse not to fund actual social services with people actually trained to provide them. Like, yes, it’s nice that you can shower at the library. But you know what’s better? An actual homeless shelter where you can sleep and eat and shower and keep your stuff safe! A lot of cities seem to be closing shelters, and the library–while admirable for providing shelter and heat and AC for much of the day–is simply not an adequate solution to the homelessness crisis. But proponents of libraries often talk like it is. I wish we could celebrate what libraries do, however, while also admitting that the government needs to do more. And they can’t keep throwing it on an already overburdened library system.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Plus, it’s the people who are actually trained to provide social services that can do the best job of that… not a librarian.
There are certain library branches in my city that welcome many homeless patrons, including a couple built specifically in impoverished neighborhoods. It’s not just that people don’t want to see homeless people (though I’m sure that’s the case for many). It’s that libraries with a lot of patronage from homeless folks may also experience safety, cleanliness, and harassment problems. Smells of urine wafting throughout the library, daily security reports, used needles found outside, people fighting and yelling at each other inside, and so on. If someone can choose to avoid these spaces, they often will.
Worth noting that libraries might be a refuge because other social services for the homeless are underfunded like mental health support, addiction support.
LikeLike
I think that’s a point that’s often overlooked. I know several people with the MLIS degree and from what they say, the degree is still all about being information professionals. They learn how to use databases, assign call numbers, find resources, etc. And a lot of it is actually geared towards admin and about the theory of the library. They do not yet routinely learn how to provide social services. Those tend to be webinars or workshops that maybe they get to pick up along the way. And that’s definitely not the same as being an actual trained professional in social work.
Yeah, that’s a good point, too. Some libraries can be overwhelmed with issues that seem impossible to solve. I’m mostly baffled because the libraries I know that people avoid really aren’t that bad. Yes, I have heard the occasional story about something happening, but if you just walk in and browse for 20 minutes and leave, probably nothing is going to happen. I think some people are just afraid of people not like them.
There is, yes, data showing that the closure of mental health institutions lead to more people with mental health problems living on the streets. I think the primary factor in that may be that these individuals do not have a family who can care for them in lieu of an institution. Still, it’s my understanding that most people with mental illness are not at all violent. So when people tell me they can’t go in the library because they are scared, I think they are working under some false assumptions. Plus, I am sure the staff are familiar with the regulars and can handle any issues that might arise.
LikeLike
I really, really hope that this is isn’t the future for libraries. All of our do offer a range of different activities and I think that it’s right that the space be used for different things. We have a D & D game every week and a lego club to name but two. However, the book space is still by the far the biggest part of the library. I just hope that it stays that way.
LikeLike
To me, programs make sense insofar as they are promoting the collection and showing what you can do with it. Like if I go to an art program, I like to see what books and databases are being offered so I can learn more about the art topic. Or if I go to a Lego program, they could have different books with Lego templates foe me to try out. I see the programs and the collection as ideally working together. I’d hate to see libraries just give up on the books completely. 😦
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think ours are just to make it a more social place. There’s always the hope that if people are in a place surrounded by books, then they might take an interest.
LikeLike
Yeah, I guess I would encourage libraries to consider their purpose. A lot or most take a door count and programs tend to bump up the number of people who walk in. So, then what? What is the library hoping to achieve once the people are in the building? Socialization is great. It’s also great to highlight resources people might not know exist or to ask about .
I just saw a library with a huge party and they were giving out prizes and goodies and everyone coming in wanted the free pencils or whatever. But did anyone check out a book? Is it enough to have a huge door count if most of the people left without learning something about the library or about literacy, or without checking anything out? That is the question I muse over. Though it’s great I can get free pencils, of course.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is my estimation that the book collections of the public libraries will evolve into the same direction as mine: only reference books, non fiction, and the highest rated fiction will be available in print. The remainder, what I call leisure reading, will be offered in a digital format: either as audio books or e-reads for tablets.
LikeLike
That’s interesting! For now, my library seems to be going in the opposite direction. I’ve actually several libraries get rid of their reference collections completely because “everything is online now” and “no one uses this stuff.” I even saw one library get rid of their local history/interest collection! (And that stuff is typically NOT online.) I don’t know what libraries are thinking sometimes. I get that maybe the usage on the local collection is low these days, but if you get rid of a bunch of that stuff, it’s very likely no one else has it at all and it’s gone forever. Like little pamphlets locals wrote on genealogy or whatever. That’s not online and it’s not being sold anymore.
LikeLike
You might have a point concerning the encyclopedias, but most `people who use the online ones, also know that you better check up on the articles and books they refer to in order to claim a certain point of view. On the other hand, when weeding a collection, one shouldn’t get rid of some contend that is not available online. That counts especially for the type of information you’ve mentioned at the end of your post. Many books that are now considered as an essential part of our literary or scientifically heritage have been slumbering on some attic for almost half a century (or more) before their rediscovery. Many examples come to mind.
LikeLike
Ah, okay. I think it’s a little different in the U.S. If you are doing in-depth research, you would want to go to an academic library. Public libraries tend to favor entertainment and pop culture kinds of titles, along with non-fiction that’s written for laypeople and some nonfiction that is suitable for kids’ homework assignments.
Some college professors used to be really resistant to students or peers citing online sources, but I think most have come to realize that the ditigized version of the article is exactly the same as the print version. And it was kind of silly to require everyone to track down the paper copy when you could pull up the digitized version straight from the library website.
LikeLiked by 1 person
When you pull down something from the Wikipedia, you have to check the sources, but it’s a nice tool to get started and to find out what literature is available on some subject.
LikeLike
Oh, libraries don’t expect people to use Wikipedia. Most pay for online databases that include professional, industry publications that are peer reviewed. And some of the encyclopedias they used to have in physical form are now available in digital form. So when they say people are using online sources, they mean they offer credible ones that they pay for. These databases typically offer content not available through a quick Google search because they are behind a paywall.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Libraries started out as places where people could borrow books they otherwise wouldn’t be able to afford. For the digitalized media goes the same reasoning: people will keep using libraries because a big amount of people can’t afford the price to access all the goodies that are behind a paywall. I believe that the main function of a library is about information management and – distribution: whatever be the carrier of that ephemerid substance.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Definitely not! Library without books is not a library. Thank you 🙏
LikeLike
That’s what I think, but I was starting to worry I was alone here! Libraries are definitely all about the stats and I have heard more than one librarian say the books aren’t getting people in the doors and they should add more computers instead. Yikes!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly! 😊🙏
LikeLike
I’m glad my local libraries aren’t falling prey to modern architectural designs and the notion of being more space than books. I walked into my library branch the other day, and it was packed full of books, and still had room for a community space, a teen space with videos games, chairs to lounge in, tables to study at, and separate rooms for small meetings. Libraries can be many things without getting rid of their books.
LikeLike
I agree! I understand smaller libraries might not have room to branch out and add new spaces and services. I saw a wonderful one with a huge garden and play areas for kids to encourage nature literacy. Well, I would certainly love that for my hometown library, but they can’t very well knock down the neighboring buildings at this point! But, if you are going to build a shiny new library where you can put anything the budget allows, why not meeting spaces AND books?
LikeLike
I haven’t physically been to my library in years and years. The library closest to me is medium sized, but still has stacks and stacks of books. These days, I pretty much exclusively use my libraries e-book collection. It’s just easier. BUT then again — once my son is old enough to not rip books, we’ll be physically going to the library for him. There is something special about libraries, and going with your mom to pick out a huge stack of books to read for the week. I really really hope this is not the future for libraries. Maybe if they had a bigger collection, I would be okay with libraries leaning into being more social spaces. But not at the expense of books. Never that.
LikeLike
I tried my library’s e-book collection, but the waitlists were very long! And due to the pricing of ebooks, that collection is rather small. So I still have to go in to find the new releases.
And, yeah, I like being social at the library, too, but not if we have to remove the books! If a building is old and can’t be renovated, I think you could make a case for clearing some room for a new computer area or whatever. But if you are building a new library and can put whatever you want in–why not books and space to hang out?
LikeLiked by 1 person
No, libraries shouldn’t shrink their book collection- they are just as important as bookstores (just in a different way)
True, I spend more time in a bookstore now, but when I was a kid I checked out books more often—-participated more in the reading programs over the summer. But stopped going when high school came—–however went only when researching for book projects and stuff like that along with papers—-especially the main senior project. Than college came (much more time in the college library on campus (only way to do English papers due to what was required on some)
Now, due to having a Kindle———use Libby to find books; so the books I read are combo of physical books and kindle books
LikeLike
I still love participating in the Summer Reading Challenge, even as an adult! One year I won a gift card to a local restaurant. It was very cool.
LikeLike
I was at a library that had an overstuffed picture book collection, where they wanted to weed it down to 50% of the shelves because that was the standard going around as a suggestion to libraries. Except, in the summer, the shelves would be EMPTY. People were checking out the thousands and thousands of picture books. I get the point of weeding enough you can actually get the books on and off the shelf without trying to shove them in, but why halve the collection when people are checking the things out?
I get I may or may not be a “typical” library user, but my first concern is always whether they have a decently-sized collection and I can actually have access to the books I want, without putting in an ILL request and waiting for every single thing I want to read. Making the library look spacious isn’t a priority for me.
LikeLike
Yeah, I don’t fully understand the trend to get rid of one-half to three-quarters of the collection. You don’t want to be overstuffed and you want room to grow, but you also want to have…some books? If I don’t see books on the shelf, I’m going to try to go to a different library that has some.
And I do hear people say it doesn’t matter because you can just order them in, but if I showed up on Tuesday for some books, I don’t want to realize there’s none in the building and that I have to come back in five days. I might be busy in five days.
I think the reality is that everything is about ease of access. Making me come back a second time because something was unavailable is not generally going to be a positive experience for me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
ooooh love the post!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
A lot of times when I’m going to the library, I’m looking for something specific, and I’ll put it on hold if it’s at another library in the same system. I wonder if there could be a system where a lot of books are stored away somewhere and only brought into the library on demand, freeing up space in the library itself to be more of that community place. It could also provide an opportunity for the libraries to showcase and stock more copies of materials that are higher in demand while still having their full collection somewhere. Maybe it would start to look more like a bookstore. And maybe that would lead to people checking out more books because of more people coming in the doors and the subtle marketing?
Total speculation of what the future could look like, but I thought it was an interesting idea.
LikeLike
Some of the libraries in my area used to have storage areas, not accessible to the public, where they would put books that did not circulate as well or that they didn’t want on the floor all the time (like holiday items). Over time, however, I think most of the libraries got rid of the storage sections in order to create space for other things like more meeting rooms. I also always got the impression that the librarians really hated me every time I asked for a book in storage, because they had to get up to find it, so I imagine none of them miss the storage section!
I can order books in now, if I think to ask for them ahead of time. But oftentimes I just walk in and find that five of the books I want are already checked out. Or that I wanted a book and forgot to put in a request for it. It’s just not as convenient for me as having a larger selection would be. I know the librarians are always really chirpy about saying, “Oh, we can just order that in for you!” but the reality is that I wanted it today, and I don’t necessarily have the ability to come back exactly when it arrives and before the hold expires.
LikeLike
I can’t remember if it was you or Briana who posted a review about a memoir from a librarian recently, but this post reminded me of it. Specifically it reminded me that I disagree with the idea of turning libraries into a combined social services or other services (e.g., exercise classes) space. I can’t speak to more rural areas where perhaps that might make more sense economically. However, in urban and suburban areas where there are a lot of people, I feel fairly confident in saying that libraries are visited and used by people for the library-specific services you’d typically find (e.g., book clubs, reading, studying). My library happens to literally be right next to a building that provides services for those who are homeless and I find that works just great. My library is also busy every time ago, so I definitely wouldn’t say they’re dead or dying, at least not in urban/surburban areas where users feel maybe they need a quiet space, or they don’t want to wait for weeks for an ebook to get freed up.
Anyway, I know I’m just rambling. But TLDR is that I don’t think most libraries will go the route of a multi-functional (i.e., non-library related) services…at least, not very soon.
LikeLike
Yes, that was Amanda Oliver’s book Overdue. She seemed rather enthusiastic about turning libraries into spaces with showers and lockers for storage. But, as I keep saying on the blog, I do think that turning libraries into pseudo-social services just give the government an excuse not to fund actual social services. What we really need are actual homeless shelters equipped with the staff and materials to perform that specific function. Not a building designed for collections and staffed by people who don’t have backgrounds in social services.
There’s also quite a bit of evidence that libraries are not dying, that a large number of people hold library cards, and that many people still visit libraries, according to data on the ALA website. The last time I checked, these numbers were pre-covid. However, I think when the economy struggles people need the library more, so I think that once people feel comfortable going into public spaces again, the library stats will still be high. Whenever someone says, “Libraries are dying,” they just tend to mean they personally don’t use it. But the actual data doesn’t back that up.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s a very good point that spaces with social services (e.g., homeless shelters) should be staffed with people trained for that type of job rather than, as you said, staffed by people who don’t have a background for that. Great post, Krysta.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What can equal the joy of finding a long-wished for book on the shelves of a library or the thrill of just browsing the shelves? A library without a good collection of books is not a library.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What you described sounds pretentious and really, really sad. I guess I am also old-fashioned because I expect tons of books when I go to a library. I like the look and especially the feel, to smell and touch and dive into the pages. I hope the library of the future is not like that modern one 😦
LikeLike
“Books do not seem to be in vogue, do not seem to be trendy enough to get libraries the funding they so desperately need” is one of the saddest sentences I’ve ever read :/. I know there’s great truth to it…and that makes me even more sad. I just…maybe I am being curmudgeonly myself but I agree with everything you’ve said here. It seems to me this sort of trend – rec centers are more important than books/information, etc. and so on – is part of this ugly anti-intellectual trend that’s been growing in our country for decades. It makes me sad and, honestly, scared.
Who do we become without books and all they contain? I’m not eager to find out. A bleak, dystopian world that would be indeed.
LikeLike
Sometimes I wonder if it’s all quite as dire as it seems. There were many articles I read during the pandemic suggesting that book sales went up and plenty of people were spending their time at home reading. It was almost like…more people would read if they just had the time! If they didn’t have to commute or spend hours looking busy at a job when they’re waiting for something to finish.
I think people might be more willing to read than we often admit. And I get sad when people automatically assume that anything but books will bring in the numbers. It’s like we’re not even giving people a chance to demonstrate that they might like reading.
And I don’t like when even readers act like reading isn’t popular or cool. Maybe if we acted like reading is a normal, interesting hobby that anyone could enjoy if they feel so inclined, people would! But if we’re going to look all gloomy and predict the end of reading, reading doesn’t look like a fun place to be, does it?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m in the midst of working on a little piece tentatively titled “No, I haven’t seen that show yet because…” as I feel a remarkable amount of my life features conversations where someone asks, “Have you seen [fill in the blank with some popular show]?” or “Where are you at in [fill in the blank some popular show]?” and I almost always say, “Uh, no I haven’t seen it.” One of the reasons is, most often (unless we’re talking about ‘Doctor Who’ or ‘Harley Quinn: The Animated Series’) I’d rather read than watch TV. I really enjoy TV but I just don’t put the time into it other seem to and, given the choice, usually I’d rather pick up a book or a comic first. People often seem unsure how to process that and, if I don’t know them very well, I can sometimes feel that little twinge of , “So you think you’re better than me because you *read*??” thing. It’s wild.
I’ve often chalked that distance reading seems to hold in our culture up to the growing anti-intellectualism that has seemed to fuel the last twenty years. But, while I’m sure that’s a piece of it, you raise some really important points here. Maybe it has more to do with the perception of reading in our culture. The point about reading rising during the pandemic is a strong indication that time is a key factor here and that people do enjoy it when they have the time for it. Plus, the fact that every chain bookstore I enter has an “As Seen On BookTok!” table shows when reading is not only normalized but shown as cool/fun/exciting than it does affect people’s desire to read.
Anyway, this conversation is making me even more inclined to read now than usual so I’m going to go do just that! I’m in the middle of ‘Doctor Who: The Ruby’s Curse’ which is a River Song adventure written by Alex Kingston herself! And that seems like a great use of my morning ;D.
LikeLike