WHAT IS CLASSIC REMARKS?
Classic Remarks is a meme hosted here at Pages Unbound that poses questions each Friday about classic literature and asks participants to engage in ongoing discussions surrounding not only themes in the novels but also questions about canon formation, the “timelessness” of literature, and modes of interpretation.
HOW CAN I PARTICIPATE?
Leave your link to your post on your own blog in the comments below. And feel free to comment with your thoughts even if you are not officially participating with a full post!
(Readers who like past prompts but missed them have also answered them on their blog later and linked back to us at Pages Unbound, so feel free to do that, too!)
THIS WEEK’S PROMPT:
Which Sherlock Holmes work should someone start with if they have never read a Holmes mystery before?
Because Sherlock Holmes stories do not need to be read in order (Watson, as narrator, might vaguely mention some previous case having occurred, but the reader needs no knowledge of it), I believe the best place for a reader new to Holmes mysteries is a story that will capture their attention and make them eager to read more. For this, I propose The Hound of the Baskervilles.
The Hound of the Baskervilles has the benefit of being a full-length novel, rather than a short story. Personally, I tend to find longer mysteries more engaging and more suspenseful than short stories, as the length gives the author time to really develop a complex narrative, introduce multiple suspects with multiple motives, etc. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle did write some excellent short stories featuring Holmes, of course, but a reader can happily delve into them after becoming familiar with Holmes in The Hound of the Baskervilles. I believe Hound is also generally one of the most beloved and recommended Holmes stories, so popular opinion also recommends it as a good place to start.
And not all Holmes stories are created equal. In 2020, I read The Sign of the Four, the second of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s Holmes stories, and I found it 1) disappointing and 2) racist. Doyle is a product of his time, of course, but I think this as an introduction to Holmes would be extremely off-putting to many readers. If one were to read the Holmes stories in order, one might start off with A Study in Scarlet, think it fine, and then be quite surprised (negatively surprised) by The Sign of the Four. So while I am generally an advocate of reading books in order, I think it unnecessary and possibly a bad idea in the case of Holmes.
What are some of your favorite Holmes stories?