Why I Still Want to Read “The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes”

Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes

The initial reactions to the news that Suzanne Collins would be releasing a prequel to the Hunger Games trilogy were enthusiastic, even 12 years after The Hunger Games first came out. Then came the summary. Suddenly, fans who had been excited to get their hands on a new Hunger Games book were disappointed to learn that that book would focus on Coriolanus Snow–the infamous president of Panem–as a teenager. No would really wants to read about the teenage years of a villain, do they?

After reading the summary, I experienced my own sense of disappointment and shock. President Snow works very well as an antagonist for Katniss. He’s as well-polished as he is contemptible, and you cannot help but feel some admiration for his craftiness even as you despise what he is doing. He is, in short, just the kind of villain readers love to hate. Did the world really need a look at his formative years? Are we going to be asked to feel sorry for him? Should we feel sorry for him? And, if we do, how could that affect our reading of The Hunger Games? Despite having initial doubts myself, I ultimately concluded that I trust Suzanne Collins’ storytelling ability and I am willing to give The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes a chance.

Stories that seek to rehabilitate or simply make villains human are not totally unheard of in YA literature. Marissa Meyer’s Heartless, a look at the Queen of Hearts as a teenager, is perhaps one of the most well-known attempts. Still, I think the news that Snow would feature as a protagonist in a prequel has some fans worried that we may be asked to sympathize with a character we have come to hate–and, thus, in some sense, we will be asked to jeopardize our values or rewrite our understanding of what was happening in The Hunger Games. Being asked to rewrite your worldview can feel a little threatening–and it may seem unnecessary in this case, when no one seemed to be asking for a prequel 12 years after the fact. But I don’t think Collins is going to give us a simplistic story arc that says, “Hey, look, Snow used to be good. You should really like him now.”

Collins’ storytelling in the original Hunger Games trilogy is quite sophisticated and nuanced. The whole point of the series is that there seems to be no black-and-white in this world gone mad. Katniss, a teenager who routinely breaks the law to survive, is now being asked to kill other children and teens if she wants to see her family again. Collins tries to make Katniss as likeable as possible by making many of her kills indirect or accidental–yet the fact remains that Katniss has blood on her hands. She is transformed by the Games into something dark, something people who were not in the Games can never fully understand. Katniss, our hero, is far from being the typical savior of a dystopian world. She’s not the “good guy” fighting the “bad guys.” She’s a girl trying to survive.

I have no reason to believe that this moral complexity will be lost in a Hunger Games prequel, or even any reason to believe that we are supposed to like or cheer on teenage Snow. The summary indicates that Snow is concerned in this book with reviving the reputation of his family name by “outwitting” and “outmaneuvering” others to become a successful mentor in the Games. Snow is invested in the Games and he is invested because his personal interests are at stake. He hardly sounds like some innocent angel readers are supposed to love. Indeed, I rather suspect the real “hero,” if there can be one, will be the unnamed female tribute from District 12 whom Snow must mentor to victory–not for her sake, but for his.

I think the complexity of this book may well indeed be a result of how it resonates with the original Hunger Games trilogy. Snow, once again, is being matched with a female tribute from District 12 and being asked to use his wits to win a game that will determine his own fate. However, while the original trilogy showed us a survivor whom we could root for, a survivor who tried to hold on to whatever humanity she had left, The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes seems likely to show us the reverse image: a teenager who sacrifices his soul to win the Games. I don’t think we are supposed to like Snow or even feel sorry for him. I think we are supposed to compare him to Katniss, and see how badly he loses the game, in the end.

What is the cost of survival? And are you willing to pay the price? These are the questions I think The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes will continue to ask. I trust Suzanne Collins to deliver another sophisticated and nuanced novel. And so, I will be reading the prequel.

30 thoughts on “Why I Still Want to Read “The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes”

  1. Holly says:

    Love thisโ€”such an interesting post! Iโ€™m also hopeful that this prequel will have the complexity and nuance that the Hunger Games does. Fingers crossed! ๐Ÿคž

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Lost In A Good Book says:

    I honestly don’t understand all the furor around the release of this book. It’s the book she wanted to write, we can choose to read it or not. Honestly, looking at early Panem sounds fascinating to me. If people want something else, or a book in the world about another character (I’m seeing a lot of Finnick fans out there), then that’s what fanfic is made for right?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Krysta says:

      Hm, yes, now that you mention it, I think a Finnick book would have sold very well! But I am also sure there’s plenty of Finnick fanfic out there! ๐Ÿ˜€

      Like

  3. MetalPhantasmReads says:

    I haven’t finished the trilogy but after I finish it, I do want to read this. You make really good points that I agree with and those are why I want to check out. I trust the author has a reason for having Snow as the main character so we shall see ๐Ÿ™‚

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Never Not Reading says:

    I am not opposed to Snow as a protagonist, and I think that could actually be *really* interesting, but I just … don’t care about this book? I don’t know why. Maybe I’ll change my mind if it gets good reviews?

    Like

  5. bibliosini says:

    You have a very interesting outlook about the novel and I agree with you. I’m gonna trust Collins to stay faithful to her own series and add on more substance to the series rather than change the readers’ perspectives on the whole trilogy!

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Jenna @ Falling Letters says:

    I agree that this book probably won’t ‘lose’ the moral complexity that Collins wrote in The Hunger Games. But I’m still not interested enough to pick it up (a Hunger Games prequel of /any/ sort isn’t something I had been wishing for), so I will wait for your review and see if that changes my mind ๐Ÿ˜›

    Like

  7. Jackie Yeager says:

    What a great perspective! I agree, Suzanne Collins is the queen of Storytelling and I canโ€™t wait to see where she takes us next. Iโ€™m literally counting the hours until my copy arrives! Your post makes me want to read it more:)

    Like

  8. Nicola @ Thoughts on Fantasy says:

    You make some very good points! I didn’t even know this prequel was coming out but I wouldn’t have anything against reading it either, I think Collins is a good writer. I’ve read some villain-backstory-exploration prequels that have fallen flat, but there’s reason to hope this won’t be one of them.

    Like

    • Krysta says:

      I’m about 100 pages in so far and I think it’s pretty good! I don’t think Collins is expecting readers to particularly like Snow–it’s pretty clear he’s cold and calculating and focused on his own survival.

      Liked by 1 person

  9. Coffee With Kels says:

    You make great points! I am currently about 200 pages into the book and I have been loving it. I think it’s super interesting how Suzanne Collins wrote the book and we get a chance to see what Snow was like when he was still young and innocent. I’ve also enjoyed getting a glimpse at what the Hunger Games looked like at the beginning and how Snow’s perspective on the games were entirely different than they during Katniss’ time.

    Like

    • Krysta says:

      Yes! I’ve just finished the book and I really enjoyed it. Collins’ prose is superb, but I also love how she looks at Snow’s upbringing and the influences coming to bear on his life. He’s not a 100% likeable character–the traits that made him a dictator are all there–but I love that Collins does hold out the possibility that Snow could choose differently.

      And, yeah, it’s fascinating to see the Games in the early days and how they evolved and why.

      Like

  10. fictionfixerreads says:

    Exactly this! I finished the book yesterday and while I do have mixed feelings about it, it’s still a fascinating read. And yes, Snow definitely doesn’t lose his trademark calculating nature. A “redemption arc” this is not.

    Like

    • Krysta says:

      Yes! I love that Collins explored the possibility that Snow COULD have chosen differently. However, I think it’s clear just from his personality that he’s not going to become some freedom fighter anytime soon. He’s out for his own survival, whatever it takes, from the start.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply! We'd love to read your thoughts!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.