10 Things I Wish the LotR Movies Had Not Changed (Extended Editions)

Tolkien Event 2020 banner

Every year on March 25, the anniversary of the Downfall of Sauron, the Tolkien Society hosts Tolkien Reading Day. This year’s theme is Nature and Industry. The primary goal is to promote the reading of the works of J.R R. Tolkien! To celebrate, Pages Unbound will be hosting two weeks of Tolkien-related posts. In addition to our own thoughts, we will be featuring a number of guest posts.


Over the years, I have enjoyed Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings films many times. There is much to admire to them! However, there are a few changes the films made with which I do not agree. Here are a few.

Star Divider

Faramir’s Characterization

Of all the changes Peter Jackson’s films make, Faramir’s characterization is my least favorite. In Tolkien’s story, Faramir serves as an image of what Bormomir might have been: a man who loves wisdom and goodness more than personal glory. Jackson, however, apparently to amp up the drama, makes Faramir into another Boromir, or perhaps something less. Because Faramir has daddy issues, he initially tries to send the Ring to Gondor to prove himself to his father, instead of doing what he knows in his heart is right–saving Gondor from itself by sending the Ring to its destruction. Faramir comes off as far more dishonorable and far less admirable in the films. But people need characters they can look up to, not only characters who show them their own weaknesses. And Boromir already did that, anyway.

smaller star divider

Treebeard’s Characterization

Like Faramir, Treebeard is portrayed as less admirable in the films. In the book, Treebeard knows Saruman is trouble and that he must be dealt with. In the films, Treebear initially decides the Ents must leave Middle-earth to its fate, until he is tricked by Merry and Pippin into discovering that Saruman has been chopping down his forest. The film makes Treebeard look both foolish (he does not know what is happening in his own forest) and selfish.

smaller star divider

Aragorn’s Characterization

Once again, Peter Jackson takes a character Tolkien portrays as noble and makes him conflicted in order to add more drama to the film. In Tolkien’s story, Aragorn knows he is a king and accepts his birthright. In the films, Aragorn is hesitant to take up his role and rejects the Sword That Was Broken. I do not see that this conflict adds much to the story since Aragorn accepts his kingship without much fuss in the end.

smaller star divider

Arwen and Aragorn’s Romance

I understand Jackson probably wanted to add some romance to his story since most of this occurs in the Appendices in Tolkien’s book. But, again, he adds superfluous drama in having Aragorn break up with Arwen. She keeps appearing to him in weird dream sequences, though, which is confusing–are they still a couple or not? Then Arwen just decides to up and leave Aragorn forever by going to the Grey Havens until she has a vision, which really just makes me thing less of her.

smaller star divider

Glorfindel’s Removal

I know many people wish Tolkien had written in more women, but Glorfindel is one of my favorite characters, so I am sad he was replaced by Arwen. Besides, the Arwen switch makes little sense when you consider how over-protective movie Elrond is. I seriously doubt he would let her leave Rivendell with Black Riders about.

smaller star divider

Theoden Looks Incompetent

In Tolkien’s story, Theoden is a respected king who leads his people well in the end. However, in the movie, he is portrayed as incompetent and foolish. Aragorn, Legolas, and Gimli apparently know better than he does how to rule his people and organize his military resistance, and they are not shy about telling him to his face that going to Helm’s Deep is a stupid idea. Why they think Edoras is more defensible, however, I do not know. It certainly does not look to me like Edoras could withstand an attack by 10,000 orcs. The movie does not address this contradiction, however. It really just wants to play up the drama by having people repeatedly stress that Theoden is leading his people to doom.

smaller star divider

The Rohirrim Can’t Tame Their Own Horses

In one random scene, the Rohirrim are shown unable to tame one of their own horses, even though they are known as Horse-masters. Aragorn, however, is perfect and therefore able to calm the horse for the Rohirrim. This makes no sense. It just feels like the film is invested by this point in making the Rohirrim look stupid so Aragorn can look awesome in contrast.

smaller star divider

The Gondorians (and Faramir) Beat Smeagol

I find it difficult to believe that Faramir would beat up Smeagol to get information from him, or that he would allow his men to do so. They are supposed to be wise, descended from the Numenoreans. Yet, in the movie, they are shown to be comfortable with beating up defenseless, starved prisoners. It really seems like Jackson does not want audiences to like Faramir.

smaller star divider

Sam Leaves Frodo

Sam would never leave Frodo, even if Frodo commanded it. This is just a fact.

smaller star divider

No Scouring of the Shire

I know the movies were already pretty long and putting an ending on the ending, as it were, might have confused movie goers. But the Scouring of the Shire just feels thematically important. You can’t go home and find it all unchanged.

19 thoughts on “10 Things I Wish the LotR Movies Had Not Changed (Extended Editions)

  1. Greg says:

    So many good points here! Your points about Faramir (REALLY didn’t like how they portrayed him) had me nodding my head, and same with the romance between Aragorn and Arwen. I had issues with that too.

    I agree about Glorfindel. Even though I think the flight to the Ford was one of the better parts of the first movie, I missed the Glorfindel connection. Too bad we couldn’t have both him AND an awesome Arwen action scene.

    It would have been neat to see a truly magnificent First Age elven lord (other than Elrond and Galadriel, of course- they’re awesome too).

    Like

    • Krysta says:

      I definitely think they could have kept Glorfindel and added an Arwen action scene. She kept popping up in visions, so I’m sure they could have her pop up somewhere with a sword instead of lying on a couch!

      Like

  2. Holly says:

    This is an amazing post!!!!! I absolutely agree, especially about the Ents. I LOVE the ents in the books, but not so much how they’re portrayed in the films.

    Like

  3. marydrover says:

    I love this so much: “Sam would never leave Frodo, even if Frodo commanded it. This is just a fact.” YES, FACTS. Sam has my heart forever, and the fact that he stands by Frodo NO MATTER WHAT is a huge part of that.

    This whole list was fantastic! I’m about to embark on a LOTR reread, and it’s been years, so I’m really curious to see how different they are in comparison to the movies.

    Like

  4. Never Not Reading says:

    Sam leaving Frodo was the one moment I have not and will never accept. All the other changes I can live with. Movies and books aren’t the same, and I love them both in different ways. But Sam. Would. Never. Leave.

    Like

  5. nsfordwriter says:

    Interesting post! I guess we *sort of* had the scouring of the Shire as shown in the vision, it just never came to pass.
    I would like to have seen Tom Bombadil in the films 😉

    Like

  6. Jackie B @ Death by Tsundoku says:

    I haven’t thought about most of these — but both your comments about Faramir are right on the nose! I was soooo frustrated with how they portrayed him. Faramir is my favorite character and, while he is still likable in the films, it’s for a VERY different reason. You pity Faramir in the films – you respect him in The Lord of the Rings.

    What I wish they hadn’t changed? Tom Bombadil. Why? Why cut him? He’s so iconic! We could have less Arwen and Aragorn romance in Fellowship and bring in Tom Bombadil!

    Like

  7. Jenna @ Falling Letters says:

    Great list. A lot of these were things that didn’t bother me in the past (ex. character changes to increase on screen tension), but stood out when I re-watched the trilogy in December. I think now that I have read the books enough times, I ‘revise’ the films in my mind to better match up!

    Like

    • Krysta says:

      I think my feelings fluctuate. The things that bother me the most are character changes. Things like the Scouring of the Shire being left out I can generally accept for a more streamlined film. But sometimes I just wish things were more how Tolkien wrote them!

      Liked by 1 person

  8. Mei-Mei says:

    Ah, my husband and I agree with all your points! (We have had similar discussions many times). Faramir and Eowyn are my favorite couple, and while Eowyn was dealt with pretty well in the movies, Faramir (and them as a couple) did not fare so well.
    Our biggest complaint: no Tom Bombadil! 🤣

    Like

  9. theorangutanlibrarian says:

    Oh yeah Faramir’s characterisation is the biggest issue for me too. And the scouring of the shire really should’ve been there! And I agree that Sam would never leave Frodo! And of course the fact that the Rohirrim can’t control their horses just to make Aragorn look cool is silly.

    Like

Leave a Reply! We'd love to read your thoughts!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.