Four Dead Queens by Astrid Scholte

Four Dead Queens


Goodreads: Four Dead Queens
: None
Source: City Book Review
Published: February 26, 2019

Official Summary

Seventeen-year-old Keralie Corrington may seem harmless, but she’s, in fact, one of Quadara’s most skilled thieves and a liar. Varin, on the other hand, is an honest, upstanding citizen of Quadara’s most enlightened region, Eonia. He runs afoul of Keralie when she steals a package from him, putting his life in danger. When Varin attempts to retrieve the package, he and Keralie both find themselves entangled in a conspiracy that leaves all four of Quadara’s queens dead.

With no other choices and on the run from Keralie’s former employer, the two decide to join forces, endeavoring to discover who has killed the queens and save their own lives in the process. When their reluctant partnership blooms into a tenuous romance, they must overcome their own dark secrets in hopes of a future together that seemed impossible just days before. But first they have to stay alive and untangle the secrets behind the nation’s four dead queens.

An enthralling fast-paced murder mystery where competing agendas collide with deadly consequences, Four Dead Queensheralds the arrival of an exciting new YA talent.

smaller star divider


Some spoilers. Do not read if you do not want to know things like the set-up of the government in the novel, the weaknesses of some of the quadrants, or how easy I thought the mystery was to solve.

I love a good high fantasy book, and Four Dead Queens was one of my most highly anticipated books of 2019.  Everything from the summary (a fantasy murder mystery) to the cover (a pile of crowns discarded like trash) is engaging and evocative.  So I am immensely disappointed to report  that this book was extremely underdeveloped and incohesive.  I initially wanted to give it three stars but settled on two when I realized there are four main components of the book–a fantasy, a dystopian, a romance, and a mystery–and none of them really work.

The fantasy aspect might be the strongest–if you can overlook the completely absurd form of government (and apparently readers can, as has been demonstrated by very popular books like Three Dark Crowns.)  I, however, cannot get over the fact there is a country with four queens who each rule a different quadrant, who claim to be acting “together” for the good of Quadara while actually deciding that nearly all the benefits of their quadrant must remain in that quadrant.  (For example, only one quadrant can produce food. For some reason, they just give it away to the other three and accept the fact they’re not “allowed” to have things like electricity from the technology quadrant to make farming easier.  Why are they not rioting?  Why are they not trying to withhold food to get what they want from the other quadrants?  What army is enforcing all this?)  Other inane rules include not allowing the queens to ever set food in their quadrant once they ascend the throne (not knowing anything about your quadrant helps you rule better, apparently), and all the queens must live in the same palace for their safety (because we all know the safest thing to do is to put all the most important people in the same place that can be taken out by a single major attack).  The set-up of this country is, frankly, ludicrous, and I couldn’t help thinking they basically deserved to have their queens murdered or couped or something so someone could set up a more stable government. Really the most shocking thing is that no one tried to murder all the queens before.

However, the book is not all high fantasy and court politics.  Interestingly, there’s a small dystopian angle when the protagonist discovers the seemingly utopian technology sector is actually a nightmare place that encourages conformity and tells people what jobs they “must” take to best use their skills in society.  This, frankly, could have been an entire book on its own, and there is so much untapped potential here.  I can envision this  novel having gone in a Divergent direction where the characters learned that keeping the quadrants so separate was stupid and that they needed the good parts of the other quadrants to help keep them all in balance, but the author never really dealt with the obvious, deep-rooted problems of the country she created.  She mentions this quadrant is actually a terrible place to live and then…kind of just moves on.

But is the romance good, you ask?  No.  No, it’s not.  The characters know each other literally for about three days.  There is no time for them to convincingly develop feelings for each other, particularly when they are thrown together initially for work purposes and later because they want to help their country.  They’re basically two colleagues working towards the same goal, and there is no real chemistry between them at all.

So…the mystery.  Also underwhelming.  I suppose you can say there is a mystery in the sense that there is a murderer and that the characters and the reader do not know who it is, but this isn’t exactly an Agatha Christie novel.  There aren’t really clues that lead the reader to help figure out who the criminal is.  If you want to be super involved with this and try to figure out what’s going on, you are going to be disappointed because a lot of the information you need is withheld (and also kind of…weird or incohesive with the rest of the story).

I so wanted to like this, and there was a ton of potential if Scholte had recognized some of the problems of the worldbuilding for Quadara and actually talked about them.  If the lesson had been that everyone realized the government system was ridiculous or unstable, I think something could have been redeemed here.  Instead, the book tried to do at least four different things and didn’t do any of them well. and I am sadly completely unable to recommend this book.

2 star review Briana

9 thoughts on “Four Dead Queens by Astrid Scholte

  1. SkiesofCloud says:

    Yeah, unfortunately I had a similar experience with this book. I really wanted the dystopian aspect of the book and the quadrant system to be challenged, but I’m glad to see I wasn’t the only one. Great review!


    • Briana | Pages Unbound says:

      I actually have a discussion post about the dystopian quadrant scheduled for a couple days from now! (I guess the short version is I do think it was vaguely “called out” in the sense that the protagonist states it is bad and we’re clearly meant to believe it’s bad, but it’s not developed because it’s…not the point of the book. And that’s *weird* because basically 100% of dystopians are about the dystopian society. I’ve never read a book where the main character was like “Oh, hey, by the way, that neighboring country is a dystopian society. Isn’t that awful?” and kind of moved on. On the other hand, I have to admit it’s really realistic to say “There are some bad things happening in the world and I think they’re bad, but I’m not going to fight them right now.” I think of all the human rights violations going on in our own world right now and exactly how little most of us, including me, are doing to stop them many of them.)

      The quadrant system is really stupid, and as I was reading, I thought that the only thing that would redeem the book would be if there were some great revelation where everyone realized the quadrant system was bad. I thought this was going to be like Divergent where everyone learned that focusing on one characteristic and making it your identity was toxic and bad for the development of society but…no. They did not learn that, to my great ire. :p

      Liked by 1 person

      • SkiesofCloud says:

        It definitely was weird to have there be a dystopian part in there without it being the focus, but you do bring up a good point there about how it is realistic, in a way.

        I’m going to be careful because I don’t want to go into too many spoilers in case people look at the comments, but I was actually expecting the villain of the story to help bring about the revelation that the quadrant system was very flawed, so I guess that’s why I was doubly disappointed by the way it turned out—I had my ideas and expectations and they weren’t fulfilled.


        • Briana | Pages Unbound says:

          I really like the idea of the villain showcasing some of the problems with the political structure. That plot line has so much potential!

          Yeah, I worry about spoilers in comments, too, but I do have a spoiler warning on the whole review for this one, so hopefully that will help a bit!

          Liked by 1 person

  2. theorangutanlibrarian says:

    Such a shame this was so disappointing. the quadrant rules don’t make much sense to me (and just seem designed to make the world building seem more “interesting”). Sometimes I wonder how royals survive in a lot of fantasy books 😉 and ugh the romance and mystery sound really lacklustre. Great review though!


    • Briana | Pages Unbound says:

      I think this is one of the biggest problems in the current YA market and has been for a couple years. “Cool, unique” world building gets a book deal, and whether it actually makes sense is irrelevant. I mean, there might be a REASON no actual countries operate like some of these YA worlds!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply! We'd love to read your thoughts!

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.