LIFEL1K3 by Jay Kristoff

LIFEL1K3Information

Goodreads: LIFEL1K3
Series: LIFEL1K3 #1
Source: Library
Published: May 29, 2018

Official Summary

On a floating junkyard beneath a radiation sky, a deadly secret lies buried in the scrap.

Eve isn’t looking for secrets—she’s too busy looking over her shoulder. The robot gladiator she’s just spent six months building has been reduced to a smoking wreck, and the only thing keeping her Grandpa from the grave was the fistful of credits she just lost to the bookies. To top it off, she’s discovered she can destroy electronics with the power of her mind, and the puritanical Brotherhood are building a coffin her size. If she’s ever had a worse day, Eve can’t remember it.

But when Eve discovers the ruins of an android boy named Ezekiel in the scrap pile she calls home, her entire world comes crashing down. With her best friend Lemon Fresh and her robotic conscience, Cricket, in tow, she and Ezekiel will trek across deserts of irradiated glass, infiltrate towering megacities and scour the graveyard of humanity’s greatest folly to save the ones Eve loves, and learn the dark secrets of her past.

Even if those secrets were better off staying buried.

Star Divider

Review

Jay Kristoff’s LIFEL1K3 joins a tradition of science fiction books that tackle the question of whether AI/androids “count” as human and should be afforded human rights like free will.  While I was initially somewhat ambivalent to the question itself, having seen it elsewhere in various forms, the strong writing, vibrant characters, and surprise plot twists kept me engaged with LIFEL1K3.

I have some nit-picky issues with the book that had me on the fence about how much I liked it while I was in the process of reading it.  (Actually, I listened to the first half on audiobook and read the last half in ebook form.)  Kristoff does a good job worldbuilding, including having so much invented slang and names that it seemed over-the-top.  The characters also vacillated between charmingly sassy and trying-too-hard sassy (something perhaps exacerbated by the audibook narrator, who read nearly everyone’s lines with uptalk and made protagonist BFFs Lemon and Eve both come across as almost stereotypically vapid).  Maybe my overall issue (since “trying too hard” is a theme here)  was just that I could “see the seams” of the book, the places where Kristoff decided “I need a futuristic cool slang term for X” and “I’m going to repeat these lines throughout the book for drama” and “I’m going stop at this part in the plot because it’s a good cliffhanger for the chapter.”

However, I ultimately prefer books with noticeable seams like this–places where the writer obviously put some thought into structure, characterization, worldbuilding, etc.– over books that don’t come together well.  So this is both a plus and a con for me and kind of cancels itself out.  And besides this, I liked a lot about the book.

Mostly, there were two major plot twists that genuinely took me by surprise. More importantly, in both cases, these twists made me reevaluate various questions about the book, including the nature of AI and what truly differentiates man from machine.  Initially, the “lifelikes,” androids so realistic you can hardly tell they’re not human except for the fact they’re “too perfect,” were not interesting representations of AI to me.  Basically, they are SO lifelife, that there barely seemed to be a real question of whether they “deserved” rights because of course they did. However, aspects in the second half of the book raised more questions about what differentiates humans from inventions that I found more compelling.

However, I also enjoyed the characters, even if their brand of sass and snark isn’t my own.  Eve’s sidekick Cricket, her “bestest” Lemon, her faithful machine dog, and her grandfather Silas are all special–smart, loyal, brave.  I admittedly found the love interest unremarkable, in the sense I didn’t really feel any chemistry between him and Eve, but that’s fine.

Overall, I do recommend this one. I didn’t like it quite as much as Illuminae, and I’m in the weird position where I don’t actually care that much about continuing to read the series, but I still think it’s a very good book.

4 stars Briana

20 thoughts on “LIFEL1K3 by Jay Kristoff

  1. jenchaos76 says:

    This is a lot like Asimov’s Robot series where robots we’re only good for serving humans. You can read the books starting with Caves of Steel. It talks about how Earth hates them and wants nothing to do with them. There are also the Solarians who kept them in the hundreds of them as.personsl slaves. It’s very interesting.

    Like

  2. Kelly Brigid says:

    Lovely review! I can definitely see what you mean about Kristoff’s writing feeling almost as if he’s trying to hard at times, but overall, I really enjoyed the characters and plot twists, and thought it made for a pretty fun novel. 🙂

    Like

  3. Milliebot says:

    I’ve had an e-arc of this to review for far too long. I enjoyed the illuminae series…or at least the first one. They got a little too formulaic for me after. But at least enough to want to give this a shot.

    Like

  4. Michael J. Miller says:

    The potential theological implications here sound fascinating. “Eve” in ancient Hebrew meant “life” or “the mother of the living” so her connecting with this A.I. character Ezekiel in a novel that explores what is or isn’t “alive” is brilliant. Also, Ezekiel was a prophet during the Babylonian exile so that name has rich theological connotations too. The whole thing just sounds really interesting.

    Also, we’re talking about A.I. and what does or doesn’t constitute “being alive” this week in our science and religion class! I team-teach it with one of my best friends/one of our school’s biology teachers. It’s always fascinating to see how the students navigate these questions.

    Like

    • Briana | Pages Unbound says:

      Yes, the naming is very interesting! There are a couple other “lifelike” androids created when Ezekiel was, and they all have Biblical names like Uriel, Gabriel, Michael, etc.

      Though I admit I was a bit miffed that the book takes the “organized religion is bad” route and portrays futuristic Christianity as a bunch of nutcases named the “Brotherhood” who seem to wear cassocks and hunt down “perversions” (and I think crucify the people?).

      That sounds like a really interesting class! And definitely fun to teach! I think I’d love hearing what students have to say about it.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Michael J. Miller says:

        Okay, I think I absolutely need to read this because “Uriel,” “Gabriel,” and “Michael” are all archangels while “Ezekiel” is a prophet. Obviously prophets and angels have very different roles. So I’m curious if the author was using them intentionally or just picking “religious sounding” names (which sometimes authors do).

        I’m with you on the “organized religion is bad” point too. I think it’s an overused and, if I’m being honest, lazy trope. I grant SO MUCH evil has been done in the name of religion – and it has for millennia. However, organized religion has brought a lot of good too. So I prefer a more nuanced look at those two sides. Otherwise it’s too simplistic for my liking. It’s bad history and theology too.

        Like

        • Briana | Pages Unbound says:

          I was thinking about the naming scheme, too, because (I didn’t mention before), the two girl androids are named Faith and Hope. And I’ve been trying to figure out the virtue/angel/prophet thing. Ezekiel is the outlier, so it makes sense he has a different name, but why are the girls virtues unless the answer is “lack of female angel names” or something. Still could have gone with actual women from the Bible though.

          Exactly! I think the religion-bashing is lazy, too, and when you do with Christianity it’s kind of like “Well no one will be offended and, you know, the Crusades happened! So Christianity is totally bad.” But maybe the hierarchy thing with Christianity is also helpful for transforming it into a bad fictional organization. I guess it’s harder to do with less structured religions.

          Like

Leave a Reply! We'd love to read your thoughts!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.