Information
Goodreads: A Sicilian Romance
Series: None
Source: Library Book Sale
Published:
Official Summary
In A Sicilian Romance (1790) Ann Radcliffe began to forge the unique mixture of the psychology of terror and poetic description that would make her the great exemplar of the Gothic novel, and the idol of the Romantics. This early novel explores the cavernous landscapes and labyrinthine passages of Sicily’s castles and convents to reveal the shameful secrets of its all-powerful aristocracy.
Review
Ann Radcliffe is one of those authors who seems to count as “classic” in large part because her work is historically important and not necessarily because it “stands the test of time.” She’s best known for launching the genre of the Gothic novel with The Mysteries of Udolpho, in the eighteenth century but her work overall tends to be predictable and melodramatic. I like reading it partially because I like to laugh at it, which is certainly not the effect Radcliffe was going for. A Sicilian Romance was no exception.
The book has all the elements one might like in a Gothic novel: castles, ghosts, brigands, underground crypts, dashing lovers, duels. The problem is that all the elements that make Radcliffe’s work recognizable also make it predictable. One can routinely guess what’s going to happen in any given scene, or even what’s going to happen 100 pages in the future. It ruins a lot of the supposed “suspense” and creepiness factor.
However, the story is so over-the-top that I kind of can’t help but enjoy it, even when it’s slow or eye roll-inducing. The ridiculousness and unlikeliness of it all is both familiar and entertaining. And, for this novel, Radcliffe got so ridiculous that I actually didn’t see part of the end coming–though I probably should have.
I don’t think Radcliffe is a master writer by any stretch of the imagination. Her distinction is largely that she did something first rather than that she did it well. However, I get enough enjoyment from reading her books that I will probably continue to pick up her work.
I haven’t read any Gothics, but reading Northanger Abbey did spark an interest – is A Sicilian Romance one you’d recommend starting with? Great review!
LikeLike
I think my favorite is The Monk by Matthew Lewis because I was actually kind of shocked by it in a way I’m not by other Gothic novels (because what’s shocking/scary has definitely changed over the past couple centuries). Radcliffe is best known for The Mysteries of Udolpho, which was the first Gothic novel really, so you could also start there. I think Radcliffe sometimes just has the problem that as the first of the genre, she’s not necessarily the *best* of the genre. Also, some things she did first might seem cliche even though they weren’t when she did them. I guess she’s just on the cheesier end of Gothic to me, but definitely worth reading if you’re interested in the genre and not actually expecting to be scared by her work or anything.
LikeLike
Thank you! I’ll bookmark both of those, and keep the history in mind to temper my expectations. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sometimes I love a good old predictable, silly story. There is something comforting about knowing exactly what sort of ridiculous you are stepping into.
LikeLike
That’s so true! I enjoy Radcliffe even though I don’t always think she’s a literary genius. :p
LikeLiked by 1 person
I still need to read Radcliffe- I’ve heard she is fun (though from things I’ve read about her, she was always considered a bit melodramatic 😉 )
LikeLike
But who doesn’t love a little melodrama now and then anyway? :p
LikeLiked by 1 person
hehe absolutely 😉
LikeLike