Every year on March 25, the anniversary of the Downfall of Sauron, the Tolkien Society hosts Tolkien Reading Day. This year’s theme is Life, Death, and Immortality. The primary goal is to promote the reading of the works of J.R R. Tolkien! To celebrate, Pages Unbound will be hosting two weeks of Tolkien-related posts. In addition to our own thoughts, we will be featuring guest posts and interviews! To see the full schedule, click here.
Goodreads: The Story of Kullervo
Publication Date: April 5, 2016
The world first publication of a previously unknown work of fantasy by J.R.R. Tolkien, which tells the powerful story of a doomed young man who is sold into slavery and who swears revenge on the magician who killed his father.
Kullervo son of Kalervo is perhaps the darkest and most tragic of all J.R.R. Tolkien’s characters. ‘Hapless Kullervo’, as Tolkien called him, is a luckless orphan boy with supernatural powers and a tragic destiny.
Brought up in the homestead of the dark magician Untamo, who killed his father, kidnapped his mother, and who tries three times to kill him when still a boy, Kullervo is alone save for the love of his twin sister, Wanona, and guarded by the magical powers of the black dog, Musti. When Kullervo is sold into slavery he swears revenge on the magician, but he will learn that even at the point of vengeance there is no escape from the cruellest of fates.
Tolkien himself said that The Story of Kullervo was ‘the germ of my attempt to write legends of my own’, and was ‘a major matter in the legends of the First Age’. Tolkien’s Kullervo is the clear ancestor of Túrin Turambar, tragic incestuous hero of The Silmarillion. In addition to it being a powerful story in its own right, The Story of Kullervo – published here for the first time with the author’s drafts, notes and lecture-essays on its source-work, The Kalevala – is a foundation stone in the structure of Tolkien’s invented world.
I have watched the publication of Tolkien’s unfinished works with immense interest. Though I questioned the intended audiences for both Beowulf and The Fall of Arthur, I loved both books and thought both were a pleasure to read. My own interest and background in medieval literature meant the academic sides of both these texts appealed to me, as well. Unfortunately. The Story of Kullervo encapsulates most of the flaws of Beowulf and The Fall of Arthur, without many upsides (though this was edited by Verlyn Flieger and not Christopher Tolkien). Little of the content is actually Tolkien’s story, and what is there is interesting mostly for academic background rather than literary merit.
The editor unquestionably was struggling to find enough content to fill out a book. The story itself is short and unfinished, so Flieger compensates by adding images of manuscript pages in Tolkien’s own hand, a few notes on the text, and two drafts of the same essay at the end. Now, these things do have some merit for an academic audience. Manuscript studies (particularly for older texts) is certainly a thing, and dedicated Tolkien scholars will be interested in seeing two drafts of one essay and seeing how Tolkien’s work evolved. A more general audience probably will not be. (I mean, as an English grad student and an avid Tolkien fan, I was barely interested in these things.)
The story itself also assumes knowledge of the Kalevala, which I shall go out on a limb and predict most general readers in the US do not. I know nothing of the Kalevala and was a bit confused by the story. And, unfortunately, Flieger has followed Christopher Tolkien’s lead in not marking notes in the main body of the story. Readers have to read the story and hold a finger open in the notes section at the same time, then flip back and check if there’s a helpful note for anything they find confusing. (Sometimes there is; sometimes there isn’t.) As with reading Beowulf, I ended up just reading the story and then reading the notes in a block when I was one., which was only manageable in this case because the story itself was so short.
“The Story of Kullervo” is also disappointing, at least in a literary sense. I will completely advocate for its value in terms of understanding Tolkien’s writing history and process. However, the story was written when Tolkien was fairly young, still in college, and it shows. The prose isn’t as polished as that in his later works. In fact, it’s full of exactly the pseudo-Old-English (“Ye Olde English,” Thanks, Jubilaire!) that gets under my skin. So, while it’s good to know Tolkien really did a lot of work on cultivating a more natural-sounding “older” English during his career, I am not a fan of his early experiments with the style.
I also found the tale confusing to follow and not fleshed-out in a way typical of myths. The general gist was: This happened, then this happened, then this happened. I actually would have liked to see Tolkien do more with his source material and expand on it, perhaps to make a novel. A lot of it is simply inexplicable and perhaps makes sense to those familiar with the source, but that isn’t clearly conveyed here, and I would have liked to see a retelling make more sense for the contemporary reader.
As for the final essay, I confess I didn’t get around to reading it yet. I finished the rest of the book and was perplexed and uncertain whether I should read more on the Kalevala before proceeding…and my interest in getting to the essay simply never perked up. I hope to get to it in the future. I hope it adds depth to a story I otherwise didn’t quite understand. But mostly this Tolkien edition has left me unsatisfied. I was planning on purchasing this upon release, but now I’m considering waiting for a paperback edition.
9 thoughts on “The Story of Kullervo by J.R.R. Tolkien (ARC Review)”
Ah it’s a pity The Story of Kullervo wasn’t as good in a literary sense for you! I know you were really excited to read it! Still, Tolkien is Tolkien, and it’s always cool to learn more about him and his early writings 🙂
I was really excited! I feel kind of bad hating on Tolkien like this (or, well, admitting that, like many authors, he improved with practice), but this just wasn’t what I was expecting after all the hype.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah of course! But it’s so good that he did improve 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the review. It doesn’t sound like The Story of Kullervo is necessarily one for me.
Sorry to hear that this book was unsatisfying, Briana. I do agree that it does require a bit of knowledge of the Kalevala, which is not exactly a well-known text in and of itself (as much as I advocate for it! lol. Thus it was curious that they opted to publish this text at all). Perhaps you might need to read it before reading Tolkien’s essay? Or maybe Tolkien’s essay might prompt you to read the epic? 😉 I think I mentioned it on my blog but he does a good job in laying out the case for reading it xD
I own a copy of the Kalevala and keep meaning to get around to it. It just hasn’t happened yet! But I do think I would appreciate Tolkien’s work here more if I had at least a passing knowledge of the Kalevala. This just really doesn’t seem like a “general audience ” book to me, though maybe others feel differently.
I decided to look at some of the old posts at your Tolkien Resources page. Great page!
I have not read the Kalevala, but going into this I knew the outline of the Kullervo story. There are many other stories (it starts with the creation of the world). I have read as a standalone tale a story called The Maid of the North, also from the Kalevala, but I don’t think that one is mentioned in The Story of Kullervo. I found it in a collection of female-centric folktales.
As for the lecture-essay (is there more than one? I can’t remember) it reminded me of reading a really enthusiastic blog post about a book you haven’t read, lol. The Kalevala is on my to-read list for someday, I just haven’t decided when to read it.
The fact that there are so many other stories is, I think, one of the reasons I felt a bit out of my element here. The other Tolkien books like “The Fall of Arthur,” even though they were very academic, were totally within my area of expertise, and then I got here and…really had no knowledge whatsoever of the tradition Tolkien was drawing on. It was so disorienting!
That’s a great take on it, though! “Blog post” sounds more relatable to me. 😀