Wolf Hall by Hilary Mantel

Wolf HallInformation

Goodreads: Wolf Hall
Series: Thomas Cromwell #1
Source: Gift
Published: 2009


Desperate for an heir, King Henry VIII charges Cardinal Wolsey with persuading the pope to declare his marriage to Katherine of Aragon invalid so he can wed Anne Boleyn.  Thomas Cromwell, though the son of a blacksmith, stands ready to step into the void when his master Wolsey fails.  Though the nobles at court long to see the downfall of such a social upstart, Cromwell impassively gathers to himself all the court’s secrets, becoming in the process Henry’s most indispensable servant.


Wolf Hall brings Tudor England to life as it traces the rise of Thomas Cromwell his murky origins as the son of a blacksmith to this role as the power behind the throne.  In the process, Hilary Mantel reinterprets English history, presenting Cromwell as an unlikely hero pitted against the powers of Catholicism and the decidedly (in this version of events) hateful Thomas More.  The result may inspire controversy, but  it is fascinating.

A winner of the Man Booker Prize, Wolf Hall possesses all of those elements so likely to garner critical acclaim–a literary style, complex characterization, and a faint air of finding life to be largely dirty and full of suffering.  The general reader, however, I suspect, may not be so quickly enamored of these elements.  For at times, Mantel seems to be striving too hard to sound literary–one can sense her struggle now and then to make a sentence sound poetic, an ending artistic.  And her characterizations are often so complex as to obscure the characters altogether–after 600 pages, Thomas Cromwell’s motivations and deepest thoughts still remain unclear and he’s the protagonist!  And the entire atmosphere of the book reeks of filth and sin and backroom dealings.  There’s only so much of such distasteful things that one can take in one sitting.

I observed all of this while reading Wolf Hall, and yet I still found myself fascinated.  I could overlook the stylistic imperfections easily enough and I could deal with the tainted atmosphere by interspersing my readings of the book with lighter fare.  As for Cromwell remaining enigmatic–why that is exactly what kept me going!  My longing for him to let down his guard, to acknowledge his true feelings to himself if to no one else, made the book interesting even when the plot did not advance for chapters.  Cromwell, and not Tudor England or Henry VIII’s divorce, is the heart of this novel.

However, though I accepted the enigmatic personality of Cromwell, I found myself disappointed by how little individuality the other characters expressed.  The majority of them seemed to talk and to think the same.  If anyone were to extract dialogue from the text and ask me to guess which character said the line, I doubt I could answer correctly.  Few characters have a unique enough voice to make it easy to differentiate–a problem compounded by Mantel’s use of the pronoun “he” to refer to various characters during a scene.  Though generally “he” refers to Cromwell, at times Mantel switches to another character, without ever using a proper name first to indicate such a change.  This means that a reader may have to go back and reread a scene once or twice simply to figure out who could possibly be saying which lines of dialogue.

I also found that very few of the characters were likable, aside from Cromwell, whom Mantel somehow manages to make sympathetic even though he plays the dirty games of intrigue and compromises his morality like anyone else at court.  This makes me wonder why almost no one else gets a pass.  Anne Boleyn is portrayed as a lying hussy.  Princess Mary is stubborn and disagreeable.  Katherine is stubborn and a fool.  Jane Seymour is kind, but a shriveling and weak.  The men are generally blustering, greedy, ready to sell their women for advancement, etc.

That brings us to Thomas More, Cromwell’s main antagonist.  I don’t doubt that many portrayals of More have been oversimplified–the narrative of how he stood by his conscience when the rest of England sold theirs to curry political favor has overshadowed anything he may or may not have done in opposing the Protestant Reformation (my understanding is that he was rumored to use torture tactics, an accusation he denied).  However, while reading, I could not help but suspect that Mantel’s interpretation stems not from a desire to add complexity to his character, but from a dislike of Catholicism.  She portrays More as torturing victims, abusing the women in his household, and being generally close-minded, a hypocrite to his own ideals, and unnecessarily rude.  Most striking of all, in this version of events, More’s refusal to acknowledge Henry as the head of the church is portrayed not as a matter of conscience, but pigheaded stubbornness and foolishness–apparently the wise do what Cromwell does, which is to give the king whatever he wants so as to preserve both life and political stability.

Of course, an author may portray More as she likes in historical fiction, but my suspicion of bias against Catholicism was confirmed by many asides passed by Cromwell against Catholicism in general–the stupidity of believing in the Real Presence, accusations of small-mindedness, a focus on all the abuses perpetrated and no mention of any good ever done by anyone associated with the Church.  I could have accepted these statements as a reflection of Cromwell’s thoughts–after all, if he’s breaking with the Church, there must be things he does not like about it or agree with it on, and he can choose to express those thoughts obscenely or rudely, if that’s his character.   However, the statements often seemed ill-placed and rather too numerous; they sprang not from events in the book but at random and everywhere.  In short, they seemed not to be Cromwell’s musings at all, but rather messages from Mantel.

Most striking of all, however, in the apparent anti-Catholic bias is the treatment Cromwell receives in comparison to More.  When More executes a Lutheran, the narrative portrays him as evil and a hypocrite to Christian charity.  When Cromwell executes a Catholic, the story rather suggests that it was a regrettable necessity.  Maybe even that the Catholic had it coming.  Again, I don’t expect a book about a champion of the Protestant Reformation to show Cromwell lauding the Church he’s breaking with.  I do, however, expect a little more nuance.

Aside from the obvious anti-Catholic bias seemingly perpetuated by the author and the disagreeable nature of almost all the characters, I did find myself enjoying Wolf Hall.  It’s not that the narrative is surprising–we all know what happens to Katherine.  Rather, it is simply intriguing to see the story from Cromwell’s perspective.  He is an outsider, an upstart.  A man who will do whatever it takes to advance.  He has no morals and he’s proud of it.  Whether readers like him or no, he provides a one-of-a-kind look at the workings of Henry VIII’s court.


4 thoughts on “Wolf Hall by Hilary Mantel

  1. Small Review says:

    Interesting. I’m a stickler for historical fiction being as factual as possible, so some of the things you mention have me questioning how much I’d like this book. I think I need to approach it as a book with an unreliable narrator, or at least a book solely from Cromwell’s perspective and not an objective look at history.


    • Krysta says:

      That’s how I tried to look at it–a view of history highly colored by Cromwell’s perspective. Still, the narrator bias was hard to ignore. But Masterpiece is doing a mini series of Wolf Hall and it’s premiering tomorrow, so I suppose you could always check that out and see how you like it.


  2. DoingDewey says:

    How disappointing! I feel like I’ve heard mostly good things about this one, but I think I’d be bothered by the underdeveloped supporting characters and the maybe also underdeveloped main character.I definitely don’t like when I feel like an author is pushing a particular agenda, either for or against religion or something else, so that might bother me as well. I’ll probably still try to get to this eventually, but reading a review with a different perspective on this book was refreshing 🙂


    • Krysta says:

      Well, I don’t know that I’d say Cromwell is underdeveloped. It’s just that he keeps his motives obscure even to himself, so you never really know what to think of him! As for the other characters–a lot of them seemed to have one major characteristic that you could associate with them. I wonder, though, if that isn’t because, when you’re in the Tudor court, you never want to show other people who you really are. I think I could have rationalized this to myself if some of the characters would have at least had their own characteristic ways of speaking. Surely being at court doesn’t mean you all have to sound the same all the time?

      I don’t think I’m alone in pointing out the evident bias against More, but then, it’s historical fiction, so you could argue that the author has some leeway of interpretation. It’s just…I started to feel sorry More, having someone portray him so nastily! I don’t know all that much about him, but I would have thought that his allowing his daughter to be educated would save him from being portrayed as misogynistic. But then, I suppose that could really happen. He might see his daughter as being a sort of exception to the rule.


Leave a Reply! We'd love to read your thoughts!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.