The Secrets of Midwives by Sally Hepworth (ARC Review)

Secrets of MidwivesInformation

Goodreads: The Secrets of Midwives
Series: None
Source: Shelf Awareness Giveaway
Publication Date: February 10, 2015

Official Summary

A novel about three generations of midwives (a woman, her mother, and her grandmother) and the secrets they keep that push them apart and ultimately bind them together

THE SECRETS OF MIDWIVES tells the story of three generations of women devoted to delivering new life into the world—and the secrets they keep that threaten to change their own lives forever. Neva Bradley, a third-generation midwife, is determined to keep the details surrounding her own pregnancy—including the identity of the baby’s father— hidden from her family and co-workers for as long as possible. Her mother, Grace, finds it impossible to let this secret rest. For Floss, Neva’s grandmother and a retired midwife, Neva’s situation thrusts her back 60 years in time to a secret that eerily mirrors her granddaughter’s—a secret which, if revealed, will have life-changing consequences for them all. Will these women reveal their secrets and deal with the inevitable consequences? Or are some secrets best kept hidden?


To start, let me say that I understand why this book is being published.  Although the ARC cover features a pile of green baby blankets, the final cover has a photo clearly meant to call to mind Call the Midwife and capitalize on the popularity of the television series (a fact that becomes even clearer when one realizes that The Secrets of Midwifes takes place in present-day Rhode Island, with only a few flashback to a time when midwifes were riding bicycles and wearing blue dresses with red cardigans).  This book, delineating the history, secrets, and relationships of three generations of women, also has clear book club appeal.  I can see that it is going to sell.  It is less clear to me how much readers will enjoy the book after they buy it.

The first major issue with The Secrets of Midwives is bad prose.  This is, of course, something of a subjective issue.  However, I have shown my ARC to enough people and skimmed enough Goodreads reviews to note that I am not in the minority when I say the writing is something the reader will probably have to ignore or overcome in order to enjoy the book.  I showed the novel to a friend who refused to stop reading after the first paragraph.  I probably would have done the same if I were in a bookstore, skimming the book and deciding whether I wished to purchase and read it.  Primarily, I finished reading The Secrets of Midwifes because I received a review copy and felt obligated to do so.  To allow other readers to make their own decisions, however, I will quote the first paragraph (AS IT APPEARS IN THE ARC; the finished book may read differently):

I suppose you could say I was born to be a midwife. Three generations of women in my family had devoted their lies to bringing babies into the world; the work was in my blood.  But my path wasn’t so obvious as that.  I wasn’t my mother—a basket-wearing hippie who rejoiced in the magic of new, precious life.  I wasn’t my grandmother—wise, no nonsense, with a strong belief in the power of natural birth, I didn’t even particularly like babies.  No, for me, the decision to become a midwife had nothing to do with babies.  And everything to do with mothers.

This certainly isn’t the passage of the novel I experienced the most annoyance reading.  But it is the place where many readers will have to decide whether they wish to keep going.

In addition to mediocre prose, the book employs a difficult structure, switching each chapter to give the point of view of Neva (the daughter), Grace (the mother), or Floss (the grandmother).  This in itself is unproblematic.  However, Hepworth does not employ her multiple points of views in (what I would consider) the most profitable way.  Readers get the very basics from Hepworth’s technique: they get a window specifically into each woman’s mind.  However, there is no obvious reason any woman is narrating any particular chapter.  Hepworth literally opens the book with the three meeting for dinner, and switches the point of view in the middle of this dinner.  First readers get Neva’s perspective on drinking tea; then they get her mother’s.  I don’t think anything is really gained by the switch, and I wish Hepworth would have more thought into who should tell what part of the story, instead of employing a very basic 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 pattern as the characters switch off.

The multiple points of view do highlight one thing, however: the skill and subtlety with which Hepworth draws Grace.  Readers are initially introduced to Grace through Neva, who, although fairly close with her mother in one sense (they hang out a lot, talk a lot, etc.) is not actually on good terms with her because she finds her overbeating and obtrusive.  Hepworth then gives Grace’s perspective, and somehow manages to convey the sense that, yes, she is a somewhat meddlesome woman who doesn’t know how to leave people alone, while eliciting some sympathy for her because, in her own mind, she always has a rationalization for her actions.

The other characters do not come across quite as nuanced to me.  The possible exception is a love interest, and there readers get the pleasure of seeing his actions and complicated decisions simply as actions—he does not get to narrate his own tale.

With prose, structure, and most of the characters disappointing me, I was left reading with the hope that the plot would be interesting.  In some ways, it is.  The book claims to be about secrets, after all, and there is one primary mover: Who is the father of Neva’s baby?  So, while ultimately I was actually bored by most of the plot, I was hooked by the cheap suspense tactic.  I wanted to know who the father was.  Unfortunately, this tactic can only work on readers once.  I know who the father is now and nothing else particularly captivated me about the book; I have no reason ever to reread it.

Neva’s grandmother Floss also has a secret, but I did not find it quite as compelling.  In actuality, hers may have been more surprising.  The book definitely leads readers to one obvious conclusion, only to hint later that maybe that is not the right answer, after all.  However, I was not personally invested in the technicalities of Floss’s past life, and while I think she does have a good reason for having kept that secret, I don’t think it comes across as that persuasive in the narrative.  A one-line explanation for why someone has hidden something for her entire life, and then a moving past that moment, is not too provocative.

The Secrets of Midwives is simply not the book for me.  With poor prose and a generally flat plot, it did not give me much to read for.  The scenes of the actual midwifery will probably be appealing to many readers.  However, I think Call the Midwife manages to get themes of the beauty and difficulties of life and motherhood across more compellingly, so anyone who has seen the show—and buys this book because they have seen the show and are now interested in midwives—might be disappointed by the book’s comparative lifelessness.  I’m disappointed I could not like the book more, but I predict the book will have a lot of commercial success, my opinion notwithstanding.


7 thoughts on “The Secrets of Midwives by Sally Hepworth (ARC Review)

  1. Lisa says:

    What a disappointment! I have the ARC for this book as well, but reading your review makes me question whether I still want to read it. Thanks for sharing your reaction.


    • Briana says:

      I haven’t looked at any other reviews yet. My “I just wasn’t compelled by the story” reaction is certainly a personal one, but I am wondering how many other readers will share it. I think underdeveloped characters and flat prose are more objective complaints, and maybe people will agree with me on those.


  2. janceewright says:

    Have you read the actual Call the Midwife trilogy? Written by Jennifer Worth, it is a set of 3 memoirs that the show is actually based on. In fact, Jennifer Worth is the show’s Jenny Lee. I found it well-written, and my roommate (who is obsessed with the show) loves it as well. Maybe you would like it better! Here’s the Goodreads link to the first book:

    It’s disappointing that this one seems so bad. I was hoping it would be similar to Call the Midwife, because it’s fascinating, but seems like this will be one I skip.


    • Briana says:

      I haven’t actually read the books the show was based on, but I’ve heard the show deviates pretty strongly in some respects. It’s good to know that the books are worth reading as well, though! Thanks!

      Yeah, as I mentioned, I think the publisher is heavily marketing this one to the “Call the Midwife” fan base, but I just don’t think it had the same heart the show does. It’s really a “Who is the father of the baby?” mystery novel.


  3. DoingDewey says:

    Unless I read more favorable reviews, I think I’ll pass on this one and no matter what I read, I’ll definitely give Call the Midwife a try first. Great review 🙂


    • Briana says:

      Thanks! A quick look at Goodreads suggests that other readers are enjoying this, but I just didn’t find it compelling. I’m wondering if it were thrown together a little too hastily to capture the current interest in midwifery. I personally would have liked to see more development in the plot and characters.


  4. jubilare says:

    “refused to stop reading” Typo? Because otherwise the surrounding statements don’t make much sense. 😉

    I confess, it’s hard to judge the prose from just that tidbit. It doesn’t strike me as great, but I’ve definitely seen worse. I would tend to agree with the term “mediocre” more than “poor,” but then I’ve not read the book. 😉 It doesn’t sound like my cuppa, anyway. You have reminded me, though, how important the decision of p.o.v. in a chapter is, though. I thank you for that, as sometimes I forget in a scramble to make sure I don’t neglect one of my p.o.v. characters.


Leave a Reply! We'd love to read your thoughts!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s