The Word Exchange by Alena Graedon (ARC Review)

The Word ExchangeInformation

Goodreads: The Word Exchange
Series: None
Source: Netgalley
Publication Date: April 8, 2014

Official Summary

In the not-so-distant future, the forecasted “death of print” has become a reality. Bookstores, libraries, newspapers, and magazines are things of the past, and we spend our time glued to handheld devices called Memes that not only keep us in constant communication but also have become so intuitive that they hail us cabs before we leave our offices, order takeout at the first growl of a hungry stomach, and even create and sell language itself in a marketplace called the Word Exchange.

Anana Johnson works with her father, Doug, at the North American Dictionary of the English Language (NADEL), where Doug is hard at work on the last edition that will ever be printed. Doug is a staunchly anti-Meme, anti-tech intellectual who fondly remembers the days when people used email (everything now is text or videoconference) to communicate—or even actually spoke to one another, for that matter. One evening, Doug disappears from the NADEL offices, leaving a single written clue: ALICE. It’s a code word he devised to signal if he ever fell into harm’s way. And thus begins Anana’s journey down the proverbial rabbit hole . . .

Joined by Bart, her bookish NADEL colleague, Anana’s search for Doug will take her into dark  basements and subterranean passageways; the stacks and reading rooms of the Mercantile Library; and secret meetings of the underground resistance, the Diachronic Society. As Anana penetrates the mystery of her father’s disappearance and a pandemic of decaying language called “word flu” spreads, The Word Exchange becomes a cautionary tale that is at once a technological thriller and a meditation on the high cultural costs of digital technology.


The Word Exchange offers a captivating premise, and bibliophiles will swarm to read this book about words, their meaning, and their potential loss in the digital age.  Graedon draws on all our modern dreams of being able to sync seamlessly with information—and all our fears about the loss of “real” reading and writing when everything is being made bite-sized to fit on a screen.  The result is a novel that is one crazy ride of viruses and epidemics and conspiracies and romance.  Its execution could be better, and a little less self-aware, but most readers will be too drawn in by the concept to be deterred by the writing and structure.

The novel is written from two characters’ points-of-views: Ana’s, whose narration is quiet and reflective, and Bart’s, whose narration is smart but occasionally endearingly gruff.  At the start Graedon seems to be warming up her writing chops because the novel reads like the work of someone who is trying very hard to be clever and include “cool” things to appeal to logophiles.  There are “witty” definitions at the beginning of each chapter, and the characters employ a plethora of “advanced vocabulary.”  Yes, this can be (and is, at the very end of the book) explained by the fact that both work for a Dictionary, but the use of the words sounds forced, as if Graedon plunked them there intentionally; it does sound as if Graedon, or Ana, are people who use such words naturally.  Ana also includes footnotes, with the somewhat unsatisfactory explanation that using footnotes helps one recuperate from the word flu faster.  Again, they generally feel forced, not like information that necessitates footnotes.

The Word Exchange also features a few sections with discursive ponderings on the meaning of words and language and love and philosophy.  Sometimes these are parts from Bart’s journal; sometimes they are letters.  Often, they reminded me of the excerpts of Goldstein’s book in 1984—a means for the author to drop huge amounts of information about the plot and philosophy of the novel on the reader.  The information is important, but it can be conveyed in more compelling manners, integrated more seamlessly into the narrative.

Overall, however, the plot of The Word Exchange is exciting.  In the first place, the characters are interesting studies on their own.  My personal favorite is Bart, and I was hooked from the start by the hints of a possible romance between him and Ana.  Their relationship is not at all stereotypically swoony, but it is very moving and meaningful.   Of course, the real focus is on the “word flu” and the very real threat that all language will be lost.  This is dystopian enough on its own, but Graedon throws in some conspiracies and people trying to hunt Ana and Bart down, just for good measure.

I am still unclear on some of the logistics of the disease and the motives of those who disseminated it, even though they were extensively explained, multiple times.  The whole idea does require some suspension of disbelief, however.  One needs to accept that technology will be able to alter one’s cells and DNA and get into one’s brain and replace words with nonsense words and that the users of this technology will not even notice (and that this is somehow financially lucrative for certain people).  One must also accept that such a disease is transmittable just by speaking to someone who has it, which seems the least likely aspect of all.  (Ironically, speaking to someone without the disease is also recommended therapy for someone with the disease.)

The Word Exchange explores a fascinating concept, and one that will resonate with many readers today.  The execution of the idea could be a bit smoother (or perhaps less pretentious in some places), but the story is both fun and evocative nonetheless.  A smart choice for readers who enjoy dystopians set in the near-future and those who enjoy words and language for their own sake.


3 thoughts on “The Word Exchange by Alena Graedon (ARC Review)

  1. DoingDewey says:

    I actually really adored the way this was written. It does get pretentious at times, but I felt the identity of the narrators was enough to make the language and philosophical musings reasonable. I also thought the author’s use of large words which I had to look up all the time was a nice way to make a point about how limited our vocabulary already is. I think it would be fantastic if I could use words as cleverly as the author does! I also found the science very well researched and thought that a biological computer which interfaced directly with our brains via a conversion between binary and protein or DNA could plausibly spread a virus. However, although book really worked for me, I can completely understand your problems with it. It is clear that the author is trying very hard to be clever. The bits about philosophy struck me as particularly pretentious. And the digressions about words and philosophy could slow the pace a lot. Anyway, apologies for the long comment! I just finished writing my review and find myself surprisingly passionate about how awesome this was 🙂


    • Briana says:

      You have a lot of great points! I did consider that the characters work at a Dictionary, and are apparently reading through the dictionary for rehab, but ultimately the use of the words felt forced to me. So, there’s context that justifies all the “big words,” but I didn’t feel the author integrated the idea as well as she could have, if that makes sense.

      I agree that the idea of technology interfacing with DNA and changing us somehow is really interesting–and maybe possible. That’s a good, general idea for the virus that worked for me. I was less clear on some of the details, but that may have been due to careless reading on my part, and not necessarily due to poor logic or explanations on the author’s part. My biggest question is how talking can transmit a disease (actual talking, not breathing or releasing saliva).

      It’s great to see your slightly different take on the book, though. I do think it will appeal to a lot of readers. I liked it myself, just wished a couple things had been done differently. I’ll definitely have to check out your review!


      • DoingDewey says:

        I agree about the talking spreading the disease being confusing! I eventually concluded that it was probably only talking to people through the Meme, but I didn’t read closely enough to be sure.


Leave a Reply! We'd love to read your thoughts!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s